NAR heretic Francis Chan now claims to be Jesus and that he can do greater things than Jesus (13:25 mark where he says it).
https://youtu.be/9X7uqS_m1FI?t=805
I believe in God. I also believe God. “Discernment is not simply a matter of telling the difference between what is right and wrong; rather it is the difference between right and almost right.” -Charles Spurgeon. Scripture is my authority for all things regarding to life and godliness. 2 Cor.10:5 We are destroying speculations and every lofty thing raised up against the knowledge of God, and we are taking every thought captive to the obedience of Christ
NAR heretic Francis Chan now claims to be Jesus and that he can do greater things than Jesus (13:25 mark where he says it).
https://youtu.be/9X7uqS_m1FI?t=805
"We have a stellar lineup of shows already in the queue with our team, and guests like Nancy Guthrie, Randy Alcorn, Lee Strobel, Carl Trueman, Kristyn Getty, and more." These are problematic people. Hinn is not sound even though he broke away from his uncle. He just has his own empire now." - Costin Hinn on his new empire plans.
The problem is that these people aren't sound. So you can leave a heretical uncle but that doesn't make you sound.
https://surphside.blogspot.com/search?q=lee+strobel
https://surphside.blogspot.com/search?q=carl+trueman
https://surphside.blogspot.com/search?q=randy+alcorn
https://surphside.blogspot.com/search?q=getty
https://surphside.blogspot.com/search?q=Nancy+Guthrie
The most glaring example is when he apologized for rightly
criticizing Ann Voskamp after she contacted him to get together for dinner
and discuss things. He contended after that contact that she was a fellow
Christian. But she’s not. She’s a pagan (panentheism, Romanistic, mystic,
spiritual sex, extra-biblical revelations/visions, which Challies
admitted to in his original critique of her “One Thousand Gifts” book,
prior to her contacting him when he suddenly backpedaled).
How bad is Voskamp's spiritual erotica? It begins:
“God makes love with grace upon grace, every moment a making of His love for us. Couldn’t I make love to God, making every moment love for Him? To know Him the way Adam knew Eve. Spirit skin to spirit skin?”
“I fly to Paris and discover how to make love to God.”
*There’s a whole lot more than these particularly in the chapter about flying to Paris (starting around p. 201), but you get the point. Eros is NOT agape, let's be clear about that. But this is what John Piper does with his "Christian hedonism" as well, after all "hedonism" comes from "hedone" and "HEDONE was the spirit (daimona) of pleasure, enjoyment and delight. As a daughter of Eros (Love) she was associated more specifically with sensual pleasure. Her opposite number were the Algea (Pains). The Romans named her Voluptas." Moreover, Piper is obsessed with "pleasure" and "delight" and feelings, even invoking "ecstasy": "Never forget, the point of the kitchen is the banquet. The aim of hermeneutics: happiness. The goal of exegesis: ecstasy."
For a non-apologetic critique: https://reformationcharlotte.org/2019/07/22/please-women-stop-reading-ann-voskamp/
Additionally Challies is a hypocrite when it comes to
discernment and discernment bloggers, giving grace (“we should think the best”,
ie have no opinion, wait and see re: CJ Mahaney and Sovereign Grace Ministries
sexual abuse charges --Mahaney’s
church went to court about sexual abuse under his leadership, spiritual abuse,
highly charismaticism) to false teachers like Rick Warren or Ann Voskamp, yet
he assigns motives to discernment bloggers (“they often operate by fear and are
marked neither by truth nor love”). https://surphside.blogspot.com/2013/04/challies-and-discernment-bloggers-his.html
*Voskamp’s panenthism and spiritual sex examples: http://www.christiananswersforthenewage.org/Articles_OneThousandGifts.html