Modern Evangelical is a failure.

Matt Chandler is set to resume the pulpit at his church soon, after stepping down in August for "inappropriate" texting with a woman who works at the church.

"“The volume of exchanges and the familiarity, which played itself out in kind of coarse and foolish joking, is just not okay for someone who has been put in the position that God has placed me in,” Chandler said." - Roys Report quoting Chandler's statement.

According to Matt Chandler's own church website:

"The elders commissioned an independent law firm to conduct a review of Matt’s messaging history across social media platforms, cell phone, and email. The investigators’ report led the elders to conclude that Matt violated our internal social media use policies, and more importantly that, while the overarching pattern of his life has been “above reproach,” he failed to meet the 1 Timothy standard for elders of being “above reproach” in this instance."

1) Chandler is disqualified from being an elder:

1Ti 3:2 An overseer, then, must be above reproach, the husband of one wife, temperate, prudent, respectable, hospitable, able to teach,

1Ti 3:7 And he must have a good reputation with those outside the church, so that he may not fall into reproach and the snare of the devil.

Titus 1:6  if any man be above reproach, the husband of one wife, having children who believe, not accused of dissipation or rebellion. 7  For the overseer must be above reproach as God's steward, not self-willed, not quick-tempered, not addicted to wine, not pugnacious, not fond of sordid gain, of sordid gain, 

2) Lawyers have nothing to do with a biblical church. It is the elders, deacons and the people who are to judge all things going on inside the church. If they cannot evaluate reality and test it against Scripture, they should examine themselves to see if they are in the faith and those leaders are also disqualified.

3) Man's policies are never the standard by which to apprise a ministry. It is Scripture ALONE that is the SOLE standard to judge elders, deacons, and the people in a local church, not a law firm.

If Chandler violated the church's policies but not Scripture, then it's a false standard.

If Chandler violated Scripture but not the church's policies, it's a false standard. Source: Julie Roys, TVC (proceed with caution--I do not endorse her website or TVC's).

Allowing For Choosing A Gender At Any Age Is Irrational and Immoral

 Allowing for adults to "chose" their gender, while against allowing children to do it, shows the actual problem now in our society even among the "conservatives".

Choosing a gender is delusional and should not be accepted at any time for anyone. It's a disconnect with reality on all levels. To be ok with adults doing this means you're ok with living in their twisted delusions, which I have to say, makes YOU delusional too. It's entirely irrational and unreasonable to give any credibility to such abject insanity. You're foundation has therefore started to crumble and you're the reason why we're on this insanity downgrade. In other words, you yourself, even *if* you claim to be "conservative", means you have no moral authority to speak out on this issue, since your argument actually begins with the presumption that choosing a gender is rational.

 
This is also the same group who thinks "pro-life" includes abortion in certain circumstances.

Gen 1:26  Then God said, "Let Us make man in Our image, according to Our likeness; and let them rule over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the sky and over the cattle and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth." 

Gen 1:27  And God created man in His own image, in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them. 

Gen 1:28  And God blessed them; and God said to them, "Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth, and subdue it; and rule over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the sky, and over every living thing that moves on the earth." 

Jenna Ellis, a lawyer, a conservative, and an Evangelical (she posts versus and "Christian" things on Instagram) who worked for Trump and was John MacArthur's lawyer in defense of his church opening back up several weeks into the Covid lockdown, had on a Roman Catholic priest who is also an exorcist, to explain about the occult. WHY?

Roman Catholics are lost and earning Hell, dead toward God and dead in their false gospel of works and Mariolatry. That an Evangelical goes to someone who is a blasphemer himself (the RCC teaches the same things about Mary as it does about Jesus according to their own Catechism (#487) and it's foundation is works-righteousness), shows just how blind she is.

This is why it is very important to judge everything by Scripture and without favoritism or partiality, and to abstain from every form of evil and reject those who claim to be Christians, but go to one of the worst religions in the world for spiritual insight.

The biblical Christian is not desperate, therefore he or she does not go to the children of darkness who are under the rule and reign of Satan (Eph. 2), for any kind of spiritual insight or morality, as well as political "victory". WE ARE NOT DESPERATE. WE DO NOT FEAR.