I was thinking last night.....
How can a woman "stand" for "traditional marriage" while dressed in a way that can cause it to be destroyed?
Would it not be perhaps more correct to say one stands for the "right" to "traditional marriage AND divorce"? Men lusting after 50 sleek, swinging female bodies couldn't possibly lead to the SANCTIFICATION OF THE MARRIAGE BED, now could it?
Heb 13:4 Let marriage be held in honor among all, and let the marriage bed be undefiled, for God will judge the sexually immoral and adulterous.
Jesus defines lust as adultery:
Mat 5:27 "You have heard that it was said, 'You shall not commit adultery.'
Mat 5:28 But I say to you that everyone who looks at a woman with lustful intent has already committed adultery with her in his heart.
Mat 5:29 If your right eye causes you to sin, tear it out and throw it away. For it is better that you lose one of your members than that your whole body be thrown into hell.
And where did the exhortation for women to follow in the footsteps of Titus 2 and Proverbs 31? Or is that optional?
Seems you Prejean defenders throw out one "moral" truth for another. You have entered the Morality Ethics Life Boat: throw one moral off the boat to "save" another. What you are blind to is that God says it ALL matters. Your compartmentalizing is HYPOCRISY.
No comments:
Post a Comment