The circling of the wagons around Ergun Caner continues, his time its by Norm Geisler. Go here for James White's reponse and questions.
I don't know what else to say except that when one repeatedly claims something to be true, when in fact it is not, that is a deception and a lie. What's so hard about this?
If Caner hasn't lied, then why is there evidence he has? Furthermore, why did he or Liberty silently revamp his bio page? If what he says is true (if one really be born in three different countries and debate people he never met), he should've left his biography as is.
Reminds me of the uh, "inconsistancies" of Benny Hinn, Mike Warnke, and Obama, with their false claims of their pasts too. Their defends got pretty upset too, when their man was questioned and proven to be lying.
Anyone questioning the obvious contradictory statements are considered "extreemists" and "slanderous". Furthermore, how is it slanderous to show the evidence of lying and then call it such?
I wonder, if like Piper, Geisler asked a few questions and Caner gave the answers he knew Geisler wanted to hear, so he could go out and be his PR man? I mean, we saw this with Piper defending Warren, when in fact we have multitudes of video, sermons, books, and articles by Warren himself to prove that he's anything but a Christian. Why are writers such as these two men unable or unwilling to do a thorough investigation themselves? Or are we to believe, like in Clinton's day, everyone else is lying except the man himself? Even when there's proof otherwise?
"A little plain-speaking would do a world of good just now. These gentlemen desire to be let alone. They want no noise raised. Of course thieves hate watch-dogs, and love darkness. It is time that somebody should spring his rattle, and call attention to the way in which God is being robbed of his glory, and man of his hope.For the present it behoves believers to be cautious, lest they lend their support and countenance to the betrayers of the Lord."~Spurgeon
No comments:
Post a Comment