Doubt Evolution? Grab a dose of imagination, says Evolutionists

Don't believe in evolution? Ya need "imaginiation"!

“The problem with those who are unable to see evolution, I think, is they don’t have imaginations,” she said in Comfort’s new video, “Evolution vs. God.” ~Gail Kennedy, anthropologist at UCLA, as reported by WND


Really? A "fact"--an "indisputable fact", as they keep claiming,  needs "imagination"? Indeed, that's what the "experts" continue to roll out for their "fact" of Evolution (see the video below time mark 24:40 where Carl Sagan also purports that to find  the truth we need "imagination and skepticism, both" and not be afraid  to "speculate", (time mark 25:00) (incidently that sounds far more like the philosophy of Mao with his Hegelian dialect method ).

To me Evolution seems more of a hypothesis (a working assupmption or guess), and not so much of theory
 and certainly not a fact (see "Scientific method").

Funny thing is, if Evolution is a hard-evidenced fact, then by now it should've gone from a hypothesis, on to a theory, tried, tested, observed, and then become a scientific law, and thus  be referred to as such. But its not.

When the outcome (data from observable and repeatable testing) doesn't match the theory, then they must go back and find out where their hypothesis was wrong. But you won't find evolutionists doing that. That would destroy their faith.

You will never hear of any scientist worth his or her salt ever refer to Evolution as "law". Why? Because Evolution cannot nor ever will be, observable and testable, and therefore this "fact" will never become a scientific law, even though a plethora of scientists (although the number is shrinking- see video time mark 44:00) buy into it as an unquestionable "fact". They know that to call it a "law" would be to make claims that they cannot prove, even though they continually claim "indisputable evidence" beyond questioning. 

Its not. And never will be.

The facts speak against Evolution, no matter how much they want to dismiss the facts or reinterpret the evidence. Their bias against the truth only shows up more obviously as the facts of God's hand in creation continues to proclaim the Truth.

Rom 1:21  Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.

Accepting a "fact" by using imagination is self-contradictory. Consider if Sagan and Gail Kennedy (in the article who was interviewed by Ray Comfort) used the word "faith" instead of "imagination", that would be far more consistent and truthful. What they hope or imagine is true, is really a matter of faith that a theory is true, even though all evidence points to a Creator with order, purpose, design, and power.

For a good treatment on what science is go here.

So, what is "science" and what is true?

Truth Project Lesson 5A: Science: What is True? from Jesus A. Romero on Vimeo.

For the first 4 lessons go here.