Global Warming "deniers" continue to be vindicated as evidence of agenda-driven "scientists" manipulate weather data.
Are you listening Obama?
“Yeah, absolutely,” he said with a laugh. “Look, it’s frustrating when the science is in front of us…We can argue about how. But let’s not argue about what’s going on. The science is compelling… The baseline fact of climate change is not something we can afford to deny. And if you profess leadership in this country at this moment in our history, then you’ve got to recognize this is going to be one of the most significant long-term challenges, if not the most significant long-term challenge, that this country faces and that the planet faces.”
“Those start multiplying, then people start thinking, ‘You know what? We’re going to reward politicians who talk to us honestly and seriously about this problem,’” he said.
~Obama, in an interview with Thomas Friedman
As the president has ramped up his attempts to curb climate change, progressive groups have amped up their attacks on climate change deniers, too.
So here's the most recent fraud concerning "global warming"or aka Climategate. Other evidence has come out, like the two email scandals :
"Three themes are emerging from the newly released emails: (1) prominent scientists central to the global warming debate are taking measures to conceal rather than disseminate underlying data and discussions; (2) these scientists view global warming as a political “cause” rather than a balanced scientific inquiry and (3) many of these scientists frankly admit to each other that much of the science is weak and dependent on deliberate manipulation of facts and data."
So now we have the latest scandal in that "undeniable" global "warming":
Quote:
Scientists at two of the world’s leading climate centres - NASA and NOAA - have been caught out manipulating temperature data to overstate the extent of the 20th century "global warming".
The evidence of their tinkering can clearly be seen at Real Science, where blogger Steven Goddard has posted a series of graphs which show "climate change" before and after the adjustments.
When the raw data is used, there is little if any evidence of global warming and some evidence of global cooling. However, once the data has been adjusted - ie fabricated by computer models - 20th century 'global warming' suddenly looks much more dramatic.
This is especially noticeable on the US temperature records. Before 2000, it was generally accepted - even by climate activists like NASA's James Hansen - that the hottest decade in the US was the 1930s.
End quote.
Why is this significant? Because it shows a few things.
1) Scientists aren't neutral. None are.
2) Scientists have a religion: science.
3) Scientists are willing to do whatever it takes to preserve their religion, even in the face of clear evidence against it.
4)Science isn't always science.
5) "Findings" can be manipulated.
6) Scientists can and do lie for their agenda.
7) Scientists are irrational when they do 2-6.
2) Scientists have a religion: science.
3) Scientists are willing to do whatever it takes to preserve their religion, even in the face of clear evidence against it.
4)Science isn't always science.
5) "Findings" can be manipulated.
6) Scientists can and do lie for their agenda.
7) Scientists are irrational when they do 2-6.
No comments:
Post a Comment